<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michigan Linguistics Department News &#187; Morphology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ling.lsa.umich.edu/home/news/category/morphology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ling.lsa.umich.edu/home/news</link>
	<description>News and Information about Michigan Linguistics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:13:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Colloquium Talk:  On the development of nominal and verbal morphology in four Lusophone creoles</title>
		<link>http://www.ling.lsa.umich.edu/home/news/2009/11/09/colloquium-talk-on-the-development-of-nominal-and-verbal-morphology-in-four-lusophone-creoles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ling.lsa.umich.edu/home/news/2009/11/09/colloquium-talk-on-the-development-of-nominal-and-verbal-morphology-in-four-lusophone-creoles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Language Contact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morphology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presentations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ling.lsa.umich.edu/home/news/?p=493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marlyse Baptista gave a colloquium address to the Pittsburgh Linguistics Colloquium Series on November 6th, 2009.
Title: On the development of nominal and verbal morphology in four lusophone creoles
Abstract
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marlyse Baptista gave a colloquium address to the Pittsburgh Linguistics Colloquium Series on November 6th, 2009.</p>
<p>Title: On the development of nominal and verbal morphology in four lusophone creoles<br />
<a href="http://www.linguistics.pitt.edu/news-events/flyers/Baptista_abstract.pdf" target="_blank">Abstract</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ling.lsa.umich.edu/home/news/2009/11/09/colloquium-talk-on-the-development-of-nominal-and-verbal-morphology-in-four-lusophone-creoles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Paper:  Bidirectional case-marking and linear adjacency</title>
		<link>http://www.ling.lsa.umich.edu/home/news/2007/09/26/new-paper-bidirectional-case-marking-and-linear-adjacency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ling.lsa.umich.edu/home/news/2007/09/26/new-paper-bidirectional-case-marking-and-linear-adjacency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Language Documentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morphology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ling.lsa.umich.edu/home/news/2007/09/26/new-paper-bidirectional-case-marking-and-linear-adjacency/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heath, Jeffrey. 2007. Bidirectional case-marking and linear adjacency. Nat Lang Linguist Theory (2007) 25:83–101 
Abstract
Bidirectional case markers in West African languages, including those of
the Songhay family, are morphemes inserted between subject and object NPs that
would otherwise be adjacent. They therefore specify both that the NP to the left is
a subject, and that the NP to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heath, Jeffrey. 2007. Bidirectional case-marking and linear adjacency. Nat Lang Linguist Theory (2007) 25:83–101 </p>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong><br />
Bidirectional case markers in West African languages, including those of<br />
the Songhay family, are morphemes inserted between subject and object NPs that<br />
would otherwise be adjacent. They therefore specify both that the NP to the left is<br />
a subject, and that the NP to the right is an object, and they cannot be bracketed<br />
uniquely with either. This is shown by the fact that these morphemes are absent when<br />
either subject or object position is (structurally and phonologically) absent, for exam-<br />
ple due to extraction. This is the only morphological case-marking in the relevant<br />
languages. The operation inserting such morphemes must have reference to constit-<br />
uent structure (NP), abstract case (subject, object), and linear adjacency. These data<br />
increase the evidence that complex case-marking operations can apply in a centrally<br />
located morphology component that has simultaneous access to categorial and linear<br />
relations. The idea is questionable that such morphological operations take place at a<br />
syntax/PF interface, where syntactic categories are first aligned with prosodic phrases,<br />
since actual prosodic (e.g. accentual) bracketings do not always coincide with the<br />
bracketings relevant to case morphology. This point is made with data from Tam-<br />
ashek (Berber) nominal prefix alternations, preceding the main section on Songhay<br />
case marking. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ling.lsa.umich.edu/home/news/2007/09/26/new-paper-bidirectional-case-marking-and-linear-adjacency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
