Archive for October, 2009

Carmel Apples to Apples: Linguistics Club meets Monday, Oct. 26

Monday, October 26th, 2009

“Caramel Apples to Apples”
Monday at 7:30pm
403 Lorch (Catford Room)

The Linguistics Club will be meeting Monday, Oct. 26 for an event we’re calling “Caramel Apples to Apples.”   The gracious LingClub exec board will be providing apples and caramel for you, which you can enjoy while playing a rousing game of “Apples to Apples.”  This will be a great way to de-stress after all those midterms (and if you still have exams coming up, take a break!).

UM Linguists at the Acoustical Society of America

Monday, October 26th, 2009

Several UM linguists will be presenting their work at the 158th meeting of the Acoustical Society of America in San Antonio, Oct. 26-30.

Presenters and abstracts listed below

The perceptual time course of coarticulatory nasalization.
Patrice S. Beddor,  Julie E. Boland, Andries Coetzee, Kevin McGowan
Abstract:
Listeners’ moment‐by‐moment processing of anticipatory vowel nasalization and a following nasal consonant was investigated. English‐speaking participants’ eye movements were monitored as they heard instructions to look at one of two pictured objects on a computer screen. Trials included pictured pairs for naturally produced words of the form CVNC‐CVC (e.g., bend‐bed), CVNC‐CVNC (bend‐bent), and CVC‐CVC (bed‐bet). Vowels in CVNC words were coarticulatorily nasalized. Results to date show that, when participants heard a CVNC word (bend), they visually fixated the correct picture earlier when the competing picture was CVC (bed)—that is, when the vowel in the competitor would be expected to be non‐nasal—than when the competitor was another CVNC word (bent). Results also suggest that participants often fixated the target CVNC picture in CVNC‐CVC trials after onset of vowel nasalization but before N onset. However, although vowel nasalization facilitated early selection of CVNC over CVC, a non‐nasalized vowel was not similarly helpful for selecting CVC over CVNC. When participants heard CVC (bed), they did not fixate the correct picture earlier when the competing picture was CVNC (bend) than when the competitor was CVC (bet). Findings are interpreted in light of production data for English and perceptual theories.

Nasal coarticulation in clear speech
Anthony Brasher
Abstract:
This study tests whether speakers, when trying to speak clearly, employ variable enhancement strategies as a function of phonetic environment. Using aerodynamic and acoustical methods, this study examines the effects of phonemic context and speaking modality and on the spatial and temporal extent of anticipatory nasal coarticulation in English. Target words are English (C)VNCvoiced (e.g., bend) and (C)VNCvoiceless (e.g., bent) words spoken in either clear or citation speech modes. In order to enhance the percept of /n/ in clear speech, speakers increase the duration of the nasal consonant in CVNCvoiced words but marginally increase, or even decrease, /n/ duration in CVNCvoiceless words. While highly variable, airflow results suggest little difference on anticipatory nasalization as a function of speech mode. These results argue against models predicting a global reduction in coarticulation in clear speech.

Effects of prosodic structure on the relative timing of articulators in English lateral production.
Susan S. Lin
Abstract:
Previous research has established that American English speakers tend to produce syllable‐final /l/ with movement of the tongue dorsum preceding movement of the tongue tip. However, the results of these studies differ with respect to the articulator timing in syllable‐initial /l/, with some claiming synchrony (Browman and Goldstein, 1995) and others claiming asynchrony in the direction opposite that of syllable‐final /l/ (Gick, 2003). This study uses ultrasound imaging to investigate the relative timing of the tongue tip and dorsum during production of syllable‐initial and syllable‐final /l/ in multiple prosodic contexts. Prosody has a significant effect on both duration and extent of articulator movement in speech production—onsets of larger prosodic units involve larger and longer movement than onsets of smaller prosodic (Keating, 2006). The explanation that these effects result from speakers’ attempts to render perceptually more clear the segments that initiate phrases and utterances suggests that examining these segments at varying prosodic positions may provide insight into speakers’ knowledge of speech perception. Current preliminary results show that American English speakers may utilize at least two distinct timing relations in initial laterals, supporting a position that speaker knowledge may be variable between speakers.

Aerodynamic modeling for concatenative speech synthesis.
Kevin B. McGowan
Abstract:
Listeners can perceive and use a wide array of fine‐grained phonetic details, including the detailed coarticulatory influences of adjacent sounds, when perceiving speech. Details like anticipatory nasalization can, for example, potentially provide the listener with a rich network of informative cues and are a key to understanding listeners’ ability to disambiguate speech sounds from seemingly ambiguous input. Unfortunately, these coarticulatory cues are generally missing or contradictory in the output of speech synthesis systems. These systems work by concatenating variable‐length sound units chosen from a large database of recorded speech. Units are chosen to minimize two functions: the cost of aligning a particular unit with the desired speech output (target cost) and the cost of adjoining the next sound to the most recently selected unit (join cost). Generally, these costs are calculated using features which can be automatically extracted from the acoustic speech signal. A unit selection database is created, automatically segmented and automatically labeled with nasal and oral airflow feature vectors. These aerodynamic features are used as a proxy for articulatory information in the calculation of join and cost functions. Listeners’ mean opinion scores are obtained on output from this system and a baseline acoustic system for comparison.

Linguistics and Philosophy Workshop: Oct. 2-4

Monday, October 19th, 2009

The 7th Workshop in Philosophy and Linguistics was held Oct. 2-4 a tthe University of Michigan.  Invited speakers included:  Jonathan Ginzburg, Nirit Kadmon, Elia Zardini, Jeroen Groenendijk and Andrew Kehler.  Discussants included:  Barbara Abbott, Nate Charlow, Jason Konek, Marcin Morzycki, Jonathan Shaheen, Nick Asher, Ezra Keshet, Ivan Mayerhofer, Craige Roberts and Dustin Tucker

Honorary Doctorate: Diane Larsen-Freeman

Monday, October 19th, 2009

Diane Larsen-Freeman will accept an honorary doctorate on Oct 17, 2009 from Hellenic-American University in Athens.  She received this honor in recognition of her “ground-breaking work in second-language acquisition and seminal contribution to teacher education.”

Congratulations, Diane!

Field Report: Cape Verde

Monday, October 19th, 2009

Marlyse Baptista and Eric Brown spent time this summer in Cape Verde recording Cape Verdean Creole speakers on the islands of Santiago and São Vicente.  This trip also launched a long term project to digitize and and post recordings of Cape Verdean Creole on the web.

Working with linguists Emanuel de Pina from the University of Cape Verde and Saidu Bangura from the University of Santiago, the Michigan linguists collected comparative morpho-syntactic data from informants all over the two islands.  Eric remained in Cape Verde for an additional 3 weeks conducting sociolinguistic interviews and collecting recorded word lists.  Both researchers are grateful to their collaborators and colleagues who made the long trip worthwhile and look forward to continued work in the area.  Keep an eye out for future presentations and publications!

Marlyse and Eric also want to acknowledge and express gratitude for the support of the Department of Linguistics, the African Studies Center and the International Institute.  Marlyse received an African Heritage Initiative Seed Grant from the African Studies Centerto help support this work

Conference Presentation: Feature Inheritance and Object Raising in Epistemic Modal Constructions in Mandarin Chinese

Monday, October 12th, 2009

Tim Chou presented his paper, “Feature Inheritance and Object Raising in Epistemic Modal Constructions in Mandarin Chinese” at the 2009 Mid-America Conference on Linguistics held at the University of Missouri, Oct. 9-11.

Excerpt from the abstract:

Epistemic modals like yinggai ‘should’ in Chinese have been assumed to be main predicates taking a TP complement as in (1a) since the subject can undergo A-movement to matrix Spec-T as in (1b) (cf. [8]). Besides, Lin (to appear) argued that the embedded object can raise to the matrix clause as illustrated by (2). What makes (2) interesting is that it appears to violate the Minimal Link Condition (MLC). Lin (to appear) suggests that the object raising in (2) is an instance of A’-movement, and the MLC violation is only apparent. However, this paper presents arguments challenging an A’-movement analysis of (2). First, given that Weak Crossover Effect (WCO) is a typical diagnosis of A’-movement (*Whoi does [hisi mother] like ti?), if object raising in (2) is an instance of A’-movement, we should expect it to be ruled out by WCO. However, this prediction is not borne out as shown in (3). Second, if object raising in (2) is actually A-movement, it should be able to feed binding condition A (Johni seems to himselfi [ti to like Mary]). This prediction is borne out as evidenced by (4). (3) and (4) jointly indicate that the object in (2) is an A-movement targeting the matrix Spec-T, rather than an instance of A’-movement. However, we need to explain why object raising in (2), as A-movement, is not excluded by MLC in Chinese.
Following Chomsky’s idea of feature inheritance ([3] and [4]), the unvalued φ-features on T are inherited from the phase head C. I assume that the embedded T in (2) does not contain any unvalued φ-features due to the lack of the CP-layer. It only has the inherent EPP feature, which needs to have only its edge filled. Crucially, in the absence of unvalued φ-features, the EPP does not impose any restriction on minimality. It only needs to attract some active goal with unvalued features to Spec-T, regardless of minimality. What determines the minimality effect in the derivation is the probe-goal relation between unvalued features, not the EPP. For this reason, the embedded object wancan ‘dinner’ may raise to embedded Spec-T for EPP requirements, producing (5a). Next, the matrix T with the unvalued φ-features inherited from C probes for the closest goal wancan ‘dinner’ at the embedded Spec-T and attracts it to its specifier for EPP as in (5b) (= (2)). In sum, the EPP alone does not force the applicability of the MLC, and the apparent MLC violation of object raising in (2) results from the lack of unvalued φ-features on the embedded T. Note that the effect of the MLC in Chinese is still evidenced elsewhere, as in (5c). The probe-goal relation between the matrix T and Zhangsan at Spec-v* cannot be established since the head of the A-chain (wancani, ti) at embedded Spec-T intervenes. As a result, Zhangsan at Spec-v* cannot move to matrix Spec-T.

The analysis  shown in this paper contributes to the long-standing debate on the motivation for A-movement in linguistic theory. Specifically, it presents evidence against the universality of a checking-based theory of A-movement (cf. [1], [5], and [6]) because even though the embedded T does not contain any unvalued features except for its inherent EPP structural requirement, argument raising still occurs. Moreover, the fact that the embedded object can raise to matrix Spec-T via embedded Spec-T in (2) indicates that Mandarin Chinese employs the delayed version of the Phase Impenetrability Condition in [2] as in (6) so that the object within the domain of v* is accessible to EPP on the embedded T. We argue that the employment of delayed PIC is related to the lack of Case-valuation by v* in Chinese (in contrast to English) as implied by the analysis of Icelandic in [7].

Conference Presentation: “Valley Spanish: Origin and Orientation”

Monday, October 12th, 2009

Anna Babel presented a paper entitled “Valley Spanish: Origin and orientation” at the First International Workshop on Andean Spanish at the Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies.

President-Elect of the SPCL: Marlyse Baptista

Monday, October 12th, 2009

Marlyse Baptista has been elected Vice-President (2009-2011) and President-Elect (2011-2013) for the Society of Pidgin and Creole Linguistics.  She was elected at the SPCL conference that took place in Cologne, Germany in August 2009.

Marlyse  presented a paper entitled “Evolution of verbal and nominal morphology in four Lusophone Creoles” at the SPCL conference in Cologne, Germany in August 2009.  She  also participated in a panel on Fieldwork Ethics at the same conference.

Faculty Recognition Award: Anne Curzan

Monday, October 12th, 2009

Anne Curzan has won a Faculty Recognition Award from the College of Literature, Science and the Arts.

From the University Record

In her seven years at U-M, Ann Curzan, Arthur F. Thurnau Professor, associate professor of English language and literature, Department of English Language and Literature; associate professor of linguistics, Department of Linguistics, LSA; and associate professor of education, SoE, has built a remarkable record of achievement in all areas of academic activity — research, teaching and service. Accolades for her “stellar intellectual and professional accomplishments” in multiple areas are numerous. In 2007 she won both the Henry Russel Award and a Thurnau professorship.

Curzan’s central scholarly work is in English diachronic syntax and semantics, the study of how the English language has changed and developed over time. More particularly, because of her 2003 book “Gender Shifts in the History of English,” she has been called “the leading authority on issues of grammatical gender in the history of English.” This book, which is a synthesis of historical linguistics, corpus linguistics and sociolinguistics, has commanded a large and diverse audience of students, linguists, cultural and literary historians, and general readers.

With a background in both linguistics and English language and literature, Curzan has wide-ranging interests and capacities, all of which she pursues with the same passion and competence that she brings to her central work in diachronic syntax and linguistic gender. She is a serious student of semantics and lexicography and an expert on North American English. And she has an intellectual passion for all issues that involve teaching, teacher training, the politics of pedagogy and classroom dynamics. She has co-authored both a book on teaching, “First Day to Final Grade,” and a textbook in her field of study, “How Language Works,” among her many other publications. She currently is working on two more books on the history of the language.

Her teaching of both undergraduate and graduate students is called “transformative” — for colleagues and other teachers as well as for students. She also has been invited to speak about teaching on campuses around the country and internationally.

In Curzan’s service to the Department of English, she successfully fashioned and instituted a radical revision of the undergraduate curriculum, and has taken on the task of directing the first-year writing program.

Linguistics Club Kick-Off Meeting: Oct. 5

Thursday, October 1st, 2009

The Michigan Linguistics Club will have its kick-off meeting in 403 Lorch on Monday, Oct. 5 at 730

The most important thing to know: there will be delicious rewards for the caloric expenditure required for ascending the many delightful flights of stairs to the Ling Department. (Or, you could take the sketchy elevator, not expend any calories, and still get the delicious rewards – we will never know…)

But seriously, what is the ling club? It is your forum.

Want to bake IPA cookies? Want to guess which facebook profile picture belongs which professor?

Maybe you don’t – maybe you think that’s silly. In which case:

What about attending linguistic related events in the community? Getting connected with other concentrators as well as professors and grad students? Talking about wacky languages and getting some advice about… gulp… applying to grad school or finding a job?

The ling club is at your service and we want to know what is fun and helpful for you! That means that we need you to come tell us just what that might be.

If you have any questions before our meeting, or just want to express your sheer excitement (yes, we know, it’s intense), direct your emails to Reed at: scipio@umich.edu.